N is a close family member. I was near enough to watch the whole arc.
Bipolar type 1 is frequently misunderstood as a mood disorder in the colloquial sense: extreme happiness followed by extreme sadness. That framing is inadequate. In its most severe presentations, bipolar type 1 involves psychosis: a genuine break from reality that is neurologically indistinguishable, in the moment, from the inside of a healthy mind. This is what makes it so hard to catch and so hard to treat. The person experiencing it has no internal signal that anything is wrong.
N's first symptom, as she later described it, was the conviction that people were listening to her through her phone and laptop. To everyone around her, she seemed normal. She was always a little unconventional, always working on something large and abstract, so the increased intensity, the pacing that clocked 10,000 steps on an average day, read to her family as productivity. Intellectual obsessiveness in someone with a strong scientific background does not look obviously different from early psychosis. That is one of the cruelest features of the illness.
What was actually happening, neurologically, is now reasonably well understood. Bipolar type 1 involves dysregulation of dopaminergic signaling, particularly in the mesolimbic pathway. During manic and psychotic episodes, dopamine transmission is excessive. The brain's pattern-detection machinery, already one of its most powerful features, goes into overdrive. Connections form between things that are not connected. Significance accrues to things that are not significant. In N's case, Facebook posts from a person she knew began to carry the texture of direct communication, of coded messages meant specifically for her. She was writing code during this period and using those imagined messages to validate her work, checking what was right and what was not against signals that existed only in her interpretation of them.
She wrote code that is still publicly visible on GitHub. The work is not without insight. The underlying mathematical intuition was real. But it was untethered from the error-correction that rigorous science requires, because her error-correction system had been replaced by a private system of signs and confirmations.
A friend, K, was the first person N told. N mentioned, in what she likely experienced as a normal disclosure, that this person V was communicating with her through Facebook posts. K responded with extraordinary gentleness. She sent an email to V to confirm that he was not doing this, and then told N, carefully, that what she was experiencing was a hallucination. It did not get through. This is not a failure of communication or of trust. It is simply what psychosis does: the alternative reality is not experienced as alternative. It is experienced as reality, with the same epistemic weight as anything else the person knows.
What did get through, eventually, was contact. K reached N's sister. Her sister told her parents. Her parents took her to a doctor. There followed an extended period of deeper psychosis and then treatment, a process that is neither linear nor clean, and that I will not reduce to a paragraph because it deserves more than that.
The science of what treatment does is worth understanding. Mood stabilizers like lithium, still after decades among the most effective interventions for bipolar type 1, work in part by modulating intracellular signaling cascades downstream of dopamine and serotonin receptors. They do not simply suppress the highs. They appear to affect neuroplasticity, to slow the kindling process by which untreated episodes make subsequent episodes more likely and more severe. The longer bipolar disorder goes untreated, the harder it becomes to treat.
Early intervention is not just clinically better. It is neurologically better.
N is now doing theoretical physics again. She works by building mathematical frameworks for things she has cared about since long before the illness. The mind that found hidden messages in Facebook posts is the same mind that finds signal in the universe: the same pattern-detection machinery, now calibrated.
Jamison writes that she would not give up her illness if she could, not entirely, because she cannot untangle it from who she is. I do not know if N would say the same. But watching her now, the continuity is visible. The illness did not interrupt the story. It is part of it.
Mental illness at the level N experienced it is not a character failing, not a lapse of discipline, not the result of too much sensitivity or too little. It is a brain doing what brains do, finding meaning, making connections, maintaining the self, with a biochemistry that has gone out of range. The appropriate response is the same as for any other organ that has gone out of range: diagnosis, treatment, time, and the refusal to let the episode define the person.
N did not let it define her. I watched her not let it.
No comments:
Post a Comment